# Difference between revisions of "Sliding-cum-rotational motion along an inclined plane"

(→Rolling down) |
(→Rolling down) |
||

Line 113: | Line 113: | ||

* If <math>\theta > \tan^{-1}[\mu_s\frac{1 + (I/mr^2)}{(I/mr^2)}]</math>, then rolling motion is not possible. | * If <math>\theta > \tan^{-1}[\mu_s\frac{1 + (I/mr^2)}{(I/mr^2)}]</math>, then rolling motion is not possible. | ||

− | We now consider special cases of various kinds of objects, and for each, we determine the maximum value <math>\theta</math> above which rolling is not possible, as well as the value of <math>a</math> in the general and limiting case. Note that <math>\alpha = a/r</math> in each case. Also note that | + | We now consider special cases of various kinds of objects, and for each, we determine the maximum value <math>\theta</math> above which rolling is not possible, as well as the value of <math>a</math> in the general and limiting case. Note that <math>\alpha = a/r</math> in each case. Also note the contrast with sliding: in the case of sliding, the maximum angle for which there is no slippage is <math>\tan^{-1}(\mu_s)</math>, whereas here the maximum angle for rolling (which means no slippage) is always bigger than that. |

{| class="sortable" border="1" | {| class="sortable" border="1" |

## Revision as of 00:31, 17 September 2010

This article discusses a scenario/arrangement whose statics/dynamics/kinematics can be understood using the ideas of classical mechanics.

View other mechanics scenarios

The scenario here is a dry body placed on a fixed dry inclined plane with an angle of inclination with the horizontal, where the body is capable of rolling along the flat incline. This includes the following possibilities for the body: solid cylinder, hollow cylinder, cylindrical annulus, solid sphere, hollow sphere. We assume that the center of rotation is also the center of the object (this happens in all the above specific examples assuming uniform density).

The extremes are (whence, the plane is horizontal) and (whence, the plane is vertical).

## Contents

## Basic components of force and torque diagrams

A good way of understanding the force diagram is using the coordinate axes as the axis along the inclined plane and normal to the inclined plane. For simplicity, we will assume a two-dimensional situation, with no forces acting along the horizontal axis that is part of the inclined plane (in our pictorial representation, this *no action* axis is the axis perpendicular to the plane).

### Taking components of the gravitational force

This part of the analysis is the same as for sliding motion along an inclined plane

The most important thing for the force diagram is understanding how the gravitational force, which acts vertically downward on the block, splits into components along and perpendicular to the incline. The component along the incline is and the component perpendicular to the incline is . The process of taking components is illustrated in the adjacent figure.

### Component perpendicular to the inclined plane

{quotation|*This part of the analysis is the same as for sliding motion along an inclined plane.*}}

In this case, assuming a stable surface of contact, and that the inclined plane does not break under the weight of the block, and no other external forces, we get the following equation from Newton's first law of motion applied to the axis perpendicular to the inclined plane:

where is the normal force between the block and the inclined plane, is the mass of the block, and is the acceleration due to gravity. acts inward on the inclined plane and outward on the block. Some observations:

Value/change in value of | Value of | Comments |
---|---|---|

(horizontal plane) | The normal force exerted on a horizontal surface equals the mass times the acceleration due to gravity, which we customarily call the weight. | |

(vertical plane) | The block and the inclined plane are barely in contact and hardly pressed together. | |

increases from to | reduces from to . The derivative is | The force pressing the block and the inclined plane reduces as the slope of the incline increases. |

For simplicity, we ignore the cases and unless specifically dealing with them.

### The rest of the analysis

This part of the analysis differs from that for sliding motion along an inclined plane because, for the purposes of determining slippage, we care, not about the overall acceleration and velocity of the body, but about the acceleration and velocity at the area of contact.

Suppose is the acceleration of the object measured positive down the inclined plane, and is the angle of rotation, measured positive in the direction that it would be if the object were rolling down. Since there are multiple cases, and the cases are qualitatively different, we consider the cases separately.

### Rolling down

If the object is rolling down, we have the relation:

This arises as follows: the relative velocity at the region of contact is zero, hence, differentiating, the relative acceleration is zero. But the relative acceleration at the region of contact is . Thus, we get .

Further, we have the following equation for the component of force diagram down the inclined plane:

Finally, we have the following torque equation about the center of the object:

This torque equation arises by the following reasoning: of the three forces , , and , the first two act through the center of the object, hence is the only contributor to a torque, and it acts at a distance from the center.

Finally, we have the constraint:

Substituting (2) in (4) gives:

Adding (3) and (6), we get:

Dividing both sides by , we obtain:

Simplifying, we get:

Using (2), we get:

Note that we have still not dealt with the constraint arising from (5). We do so now. Combining (5) with (1) (the component of the force diagram perpendicular to the inclined plane) we get:

Also, combining (3) and (7), we get:

Combining (9) and (10), we obtain that:

The and cancel out, and we get:

Or equivalently:

The upshot is that:

- If then rolling motion is possible, with , , and .
- If , then rolling motion is not possible.

We now consider special cases of various kinds of objects, and for each, we determine the maximum value above which rolling is not possible, as well as the value of in the general and limiting case. Note that in each case. Also note the contrast with sliding: in the case of sliding, the maximum angle for which there is no slippage is , whereas here the maximum angle for rolling (which means no slippage) is always bigger than that.

Object | for largest allowing rolling | assuming rolling | for largest allowing rolling | |
---|---|---|---|---|

General | (say) | |||

Solid cylinder | 1/2 | 3 | ||

Hollow cylinder | 1 | 2 | ||

Solid sphere | 2/5 | 7/2 |